Ad is loading...
FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUSX vs MTLFX
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultrashort IS
Price$9.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUSX vs. MTLFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUSX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.62B vs. FMUSX (1.18B). FMUSX pays higher dividends than MTLFX: FMUSX (3.18) vs MTLFX (2.94). FMUSX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FMUSX (25 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FMUSX (0.45). FMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: MTLFX (1000) vs FMUSX (1000000). FMUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. MTLFX (3.14). FMUSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.30 vs. MTLFX (7.84).
| FMUSX | MTLFX | FMUSX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.666 | 0.134 | 497% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 2.62B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.94 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 3.14 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 7.71 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.30 | 7.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.19 | 14.59 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...