Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUSX vs MTLFX
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultrashort IS
Price$10.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$8.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUSX vs. MTLFX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUSX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. FMUSX (1.25B). FMUSX (3.13) and MTLFX (3.02) have matching dividends . FMUSX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FMUSX (25 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FMUSX (0.45). FMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MTLFX (29.00). MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: MTLFX (1000) vs FMUSX (1000000). FMUSX (3.39) and MTLFX (3.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FMUSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.30 vs. MTLFX (6.29).
| FMUSX | MTLFX | FMUSX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.219 | 2.710 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 2.78B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 3.02 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 3.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.65 | 8.56 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.30 | 6.29 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.14 | 17.68 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement