Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUSX vs MTLFX
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultrashort IS
Price$10.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$8.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.87B
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUSX vs. MTLFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUSX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.87B vs. FMUSX (1.36B). FMUSX (3.10) and MTLFX (3.03) have matching dividends . FMUSX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FMUSX (25 years) vs MTLFX (34 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FMUSX (0.45). FMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MTLFX (29.00). MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: MTLFX (1000) vs FMUSX (1000000). MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. FMUSX (3.26). FMUSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.62 vs. MTLFX (7.46).
| FMUSX | MTLFX | FMUSX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.578 | 3.752 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 2.87B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 3.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 3.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.57 | 13.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | 7.46 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.49 | 18.59 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement