Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUSX vs. MTLFX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUSX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. FMUSX (1.47B). MTLFX pays higher dividends than FMUSX: MTLFX (3.09) vs FMUSX (2.89). FMUSX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FMUSX (26 years) vs MTLFX (34 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FMUSX (0.45). FMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. MTLFX (29.00). MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: MTLFX (1000) vs FMUSX (1000000). MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.70 vs. FMUSX (3.24). FMUSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.09 vs. MTLFX (7.44).
| FMUSX | MTLFX | FMUSX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.145 | 0.906 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 3.12B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | 4.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.05 | 12.58 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.09 | 7.44 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.41 | 18.62 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers