Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUSX vs MTLFX
FMUSX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUSX vs. MTLFX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUSX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 3.05B vs. FMUSX (1.5B). MTLFX pays higher dividends than FMUSX: MTLFX (3.12) vs FMUSX (2.84). FMUSX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FMUSX (26 years) vs MTLFX (35 years). MTLFX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FMUSX (0.45). FMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. MTLFX (26.00). MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: MTLFX (1000) vs FMUSX (1000000). FMUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. MTLFX (-0.03). FMUSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.21 vs. MTLFX (5.52).
| FMUSX | MTLFX | FMUSX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.71 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.231 | -0.696 | -177% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 3.05B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | -0.03 | -5,853% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.28 | 10.70 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.21 | 5.52 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.14 | 16.47 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement