FMX vs FMXUF
To understand the difference between Fomento Economico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. - ADR (FMX) vs. Fomento Economico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. - Units (Rep. 1 Series B & 4 Series D Shares) (FMXUF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR and Units
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Units - The Units are a combination of securities. Generally, after 45-52 days after the Unit commenced public trading, it can be converted into securities that can be traded separately.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMXUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FMXUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FMX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FMX (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while FMXUF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
FMX is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.29% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| FMX | FMXUF | FMX / FMXUF | |
| Capitalization | 233B | 31B | 752% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 68.2B | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.727 | -7.381 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 112.91 | 26.18 | 431% |
| Revenue | N/A | 736B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 165B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 233B | - |
FMX | FMXUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMXUF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FMX (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that FMXUF’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
FMX's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMXUF (100) in the null industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to FMXUF’s over the last 12 months.
FMX's SMR Rating (84) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMXUF (84) in the null industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to FMXUF’s over the last 12 months.
FMX's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMXUF (82) in the null industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to FMXUF’s over the last 12 months.
FMX's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMXUF (57) in the null industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMXUF’s over the last 12 months.
| FMX | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
FMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FMX and ABEV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMX and ABEV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMX | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| ABEV - FMX | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CCU - FMX | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| FMXUF - FMX | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRNDY - FMX | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CABGY - FMX | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
More | ||||
FMXUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FMXUF and FMX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMXUF and FMX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMXUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMXUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FMX - FMXUF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| NWINF - FMXUF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HINKF - FMXUF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| KNBWY - FMXUF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| KNBWF - FMXUF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||