FN vs LGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a Hold and LGL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а -16.48% price change this week, while LGL (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -7.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
FN is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.
LGL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-7.21% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| FN | LGL | FN / LGL | |
| Capitalization | 7.27B | 37M | 19,638% |
| EBITDA | 395M | -1.31M | -30,245% |
| Gain YTD | -21.521 | 15.410 | -140% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.30 | 86.13 | 22% |
| Revenue | 3.12B | 2.02M | 154,681% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 41.6M | 2,248% |
| Total Debt | 6.09M | 587K | 1,038% |
FN | LGL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FN's Valuation (68) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (75) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.
FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (38) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.
FN's SMR Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGL (89) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FN (56) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LGL’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.
LGL's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FN (80) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LGL’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.
| FN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
FN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
LGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGL and DAIO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGL and DAIO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGL | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| DAIO - LGL | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
| VICR - LGL | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.99% | ||
| KULR - LGL | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| FN - LGL | 20% Poorly correlated | -14.52% | ||
| CLS - LGL | 20% Poorly correlated | -15.98% | ||
More | ||||