Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. FSTEX (548M). FNARX (1.79) and FSTEX (1.74) have matching dividends . FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (42 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSTEX (23.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.28 vs. FSTEX (24.31). FNARX (141.16) and FSTEX (140.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.450 | 19.955 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 548M | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.28 | 24.31 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.51 | 57.90 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.16 | 140.00 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.75 | 73.78 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement