Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Buy and FSTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. FSTEX (539M). FNARX (1.93) and FSTEX (1.89) have matching dividends . FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (43 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSTEX (28.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.09 vs. FSTEX (26.54). FSTEX (164.00) and FNARX (156.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.718 | 22.774 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 867M | 539M | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.89 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.09 | 26.54 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.39 | 55.28 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 156.02 | 164.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.02 | 73.54 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement