Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 919M vs. FSTEX (626M). FNARX pays higher dividends than FSTEX: FNARX (1.78) vs FSTEX (1.66). FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (43 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSTEX (28.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.96 vs. FSTEX (50.11). FSTEX (236.80) and FNARX (230.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.508 | 42.024 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 919M | 626M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.66 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.96 | 50.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.48 | 68.14 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 230.94 | 236.80 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.46 | 100.75 | 174% |