Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and FSTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. FSTEX (652M). FNARX (1.61) and FSTEX (1.57) have matching dividends . FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (30 years) vs FSTEX (43 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSTEX (28.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FSTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.35 vs. FNARX (45.54). FSTEX return over 5 years is better than : 222.44 vs. FNARX (211.48).
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.661 | 44.395 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 652M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 1.57 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.54 | 49.35 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.92 | 61.67 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 211.48 | 222.44 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.28 | 113.60 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers