Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 919M vs. FSTEX (591M). FNARX pays higher dividends than FSTEX: FNARX (1.78) vs FSTEX (1.66). FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (43 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSTEX (28.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FSTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.84 vs. FNARX (39.58). FSTEX return over 5 years is better than : 198.14 vs. FNARX (175.00).
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.693 | 34.113 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 919M | 591M | 155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.66 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.58 | 41.84 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.27 | 59.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 175.00 | 198.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.22 | 106.18 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement