Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. ICWIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. ICWIX (206M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FNARX (1.61) vs ICWIX (0.52). FNARX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FNARX (30 years) vs ICWIX (10 years). ICWIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ICWIX (63.34). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FNARX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.54 vs. ICWIX (39.06). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 211.48 vs. ICWIX (168.96).
| FNARX | ICWIX | FNARX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.661 | 34.310 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 206M | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.52 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.54 | 39.06 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.92 | 77.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 211.48 | 168.96 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.28 | 111.73 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers