Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. ICWIX (195M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FNARX (1.79) vs ICWIX (0.79). FNARX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FNARX (29 years) vs ICWIX (10 years). ICWIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ICWIX (63.34). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FNARX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.92 vs. FNARX (30.28). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 141.16 vs. ICWIX (131.58).
| FNARX | ICWIX | FNARX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.450 | 26.532 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 195M | 505% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.79 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.28 | 37.92 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.51 | 96.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.16 | 131.58 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement