Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs IEFCX
FNARX vs IEFCX Comparison
Open Charts FNARX vs IEFCX
FNARX vs IEFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. IEFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and IEFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. IEFCX (554M). FNARX pays higher dividends than IEFCX: FNARX (1.79) vs IEFCX (1.32). FNARX was incepted earlier than IEFCX: FNARX (29 years) vs IEFCX (26 years). IEFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. IEFCX (23.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than IEFCX: FNARX (0) vs IEFCX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.28 vs. IEFCX (23.44). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 141.16 vs. IEFCX (131.27).
| FNARX | IEFCX | FNARX / IEFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.98 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.98 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.450 | 19.533 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 554M | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.32 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.28 | 23.44 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.51 | 54.46 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.16 | 131.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.75 | 62.49 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement