FNB
Price
$14.28
Change
-$0.09 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.97B
21 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$55.92
Change
-$0.22 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jun 25, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs HWC

Header iconFNB vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs HWCBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$14.28
Change-$0.09 (-0.63%)
Volume$60.83K
Capitalization4.97B
Hancock Whitney
Price$55.92
Change-$0.22 (-0.39%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4B
FNB vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. HWC commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a StrongBuy and HWC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $14.37 vs. HWC: $56.14)
Brand notoriety: FNB and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 113% vs. HWC: 117%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $4.97B vs. HWC: $4B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.97B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.35% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($4.97B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4B). FNB has higher P/E ratio than HWC: FNB (10.55) vs HWC (9.98). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 4.317 vs. FNB (-1.126). HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. FNB (447M). HWC has less debt than FNB: HWC (1.52B) vs FNB (3.98B). FNB has higher revenues than HWC: FNB (1.57B) vs HWC (1.37B).
FNBHWCFNB / HWC
Capitalization4.97B4B124%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.1264.317-26%
P/E Ratio10.559.98106%
Revenue1.57B1.37B115%
Total Cash447M561M80%
Total Debt3.98B1.52B263%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2825
SMR RATING
1..100
10011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4758
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (57). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (28). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNB (100). This means that HWC’s stock grew significantly faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (52). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (58). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNQI51.051.17
+2.35%
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
RSPT39.990.86
+2.20%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
BLES40.680.45
+1.12%
Inspire Global Hope ETF
FXN15.34-0.04
-0.26%
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® ETF
REW7.80-0.30
-3.76%
ProShares UltraShort Technology

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+1.41%
ABCB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
ASB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
SNV - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
UBSI - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
More