FNB
Price
$13.69
Change
-$0.13 (-0.94%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
66 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$34.36
Change
-$0.18 (-0.52%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
92 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNB vs IFS

Header iconFNB vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs IFSBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$13.69
Change-$0.13 (-0.94%)
Volume$2.02M
Capitalization4.97B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$34.36
Change-$0.18 (-0.52%)
Volume$350.65K
Capitalization2.77B
FNB vs IFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. IFS commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a StrongBuy and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $13.69 vs. IFS: $34.36)
Brand notoriety: FNB and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 64% vs. IFS: 172%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $4.97B vs. IFS: $2.77B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.97B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than FNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($4.97B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). FNB has higher P/E ratio than IFS: FNB (10.55) vs IFS (9.76). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 20.862 vs. FNB (-6.620). FNB has less debt than IFS: FNB (3.98B) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than FNB: IFS (6.82B) vs FNB (1.57B).
FNBIFSFNB / IFS
Capitalization4.97B2.77B179%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.62020.862-32%
P/E Ratio10.559.76108%
Revenue1.57B6.82B23%
Total Cash447MN/A-
Total Debt3.98B10.4B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2836
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (66) in the null industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (36) in the null industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FNB (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FNB (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as FNB (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LICPX16.410.11
+0.67%
Lord Abbett International Equity P
LMBCX10.630.02
+0.19%
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
RIRAX72.700.11
+0.15%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R1
PLVIX18.600.02
+0.11%
Principal Large Cap Value III Inst
ETCHX26.66-0.45
-1.66%
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences C

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
-0.94%
WTFC - FNB
94%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
ASB - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
SNV - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
HWC - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
ONB - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-0.52%
BAP - IFS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
BSAC - IFS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
OBK - IFS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
EWBC - IFS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
OSBC - IFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
More