FNB
Price
$16.64
Change
-$0.02 (-0.12%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.96B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WASH
Price
$28.40
Change
-$0.19 (-0.66%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
540.59M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs WASH

Header iconFNB vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs WASHBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$16.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
Volume$1.64M
Capitalization5.96B
Washington Trust Ban
Price$28.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.66%)
Volume$40.25K
Capitalization540.59M
FNB vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. WASH commentary
Nov 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a StrongBuy and WASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $16.64 vs. WASH: $28.40)
Brand notoriety: FNB and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 16% vs. WASH: 30%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $5.96B vs. WASH: $540.59M
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.96B. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $540.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WASH is a better buy in the short-term than FNB.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.74% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($5.96B) has a higher market cap than WASH($541M). WASH (12.16) and FNB (11.89) have similar P/E ratio . FNB YTD gains are higher at: 15.322 vs. WASH (-2.266). FNB has more cash in the bank: 535M vs. WASH (44M). WASH has less debt than FNB: WASH (1.06B) vs FNB (3.71B). FNB has higher revenues than WASH: FNB (1.64B) vs WASH (111M).
FNBWASHFNB / WASH
Capitalization5.96B541M1,101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.322-2.266-676%
P/E Ratio11.8912.1698%
Revenue1.64B111M1,473%
Total Cash535M44M1,216%
Total Debt3.71B1.06B349%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1674
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2589
SMR RATING
1..100
1165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WASH's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (70). This means that WASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (89). This means that FNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (65). This means that FNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (58). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (73). This means that WASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDVIX31.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl I
INTIX13.63N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port S
DTLVX23.95N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Value Invmt
AMIGX95.85N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Institutional
PAHSX7.07N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps A