Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs WHOSX
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs WHOSX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.02B
Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury
Price$10.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.97M
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. WHOSX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and WHOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 5.02B vs. WHOSX (147M). WHOSX (3.83) and FNBGX (3.79) have matching dividends . FNBGX was incepted earlier than WHOSX: FNBGX (8 years) vs WHOSX (39 years). WHOSX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). WHOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHOSX: FNBGX (0) vs WHOSX (2000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.88 vs. WHOSX (-1.62). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -33.72 vs. WHOSX (-45.43).
| FNBGX | WHOSX | FNBGX / WHOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.316 | 5.880 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 147M | 3,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 3.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | -1.62 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | -2.48 | -254% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.72 | -45.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -27.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement