Ad is loading...
FNBGX vs WHOSX
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs WHOSX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.84B
Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury
Price$10.37
Change-$0.12 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.96M
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. WHOSX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and WHOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.84B vs. WHOSX (146M). WHOSX (3.84) and FNBGX (3.73) have matching dividends . FNBGX was incepted earlier than WHOSX: FNBGX (8 years) vs WHOSX (38 years). WHOSX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). FNBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. WHOSX (13.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHOSX: FNBGX (0) vs WHOSX (2000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. WHOSX (4.95). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -37.96 vs. WHOSX (-48.59).
| FNBGX | WHOSX | FNBGX / WHOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.252 | 3.235 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.84B | 146M | 3,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 3.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 4.95 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.76 | -22.16 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.96 | -48.59 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -29.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers