Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs WHOSX
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs WHOSX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury
Price$10.12
Change+$0.07 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.3M
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. WHOSX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and WHOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. WHOSX (135M). WHOSX (3.94) and FNBGX (3.87) have matching dividends . FNBGX was incepted earlier than WHOSX: FNBGX (8 years) vs WHOSX (39 years). WHOSX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). WHOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHOSX: FNBGX (0) vs WHOSX (2000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.18 vs. WHOSX (-7.75). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -40.03 vs. WHOSX (-51.85).
| FNBGX | WHOSX | FNBGX / WHOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.929 | -0.943 | -205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 135M | 3,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 3.94 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.18 | -7.75 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.98 | -25.53 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.03 | -51.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -32.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement