Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs WHOSX
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs WHOSX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.28
Change+$0.08 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury
Price$10.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06M
FNBGX vs WHOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. WHOSX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and WHOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. WHOSX (137M). WHOSX (4.02) and FNBGX (3.87) have matching dividends . FNBGX was incepted earlier than WHOSX: FNBGX (8 years) vs WHOSX (39 years). WHOSX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). FNBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. WHOSX (13.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHOSX: FNBGX (0) vs WHOSX (2000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. WHOSX (-4.69). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -37.38 vs. WHOSX (-48.80).
| FNBGX | WHOSX | FNBGX / WHOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | -0.278 | -695% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 137M | 3,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 4.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -4.69 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.60 | -21.76 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.38 | -48.80 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -26.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers