Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBAX
FNCFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBAX
FNCFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FNCFX (79.7B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FNCFX (5.38) vs RLBAX (1.12). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FNCFX (13 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNCFX (0.42). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBAX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). FNCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. RLBAX (5.83). FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.96 vs. RLBAX (27.39).
| FNCFX | RLBAX | FNCFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.32 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.32 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.325 | 7.935 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.7B | 285B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.38 | 1.12 | 481% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 5.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 38.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.96 | 27.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.76 | 75.00 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement