Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBAX
FNCFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBAX
FNCFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FNCFX (80.5B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FNCFX (5.43) vs RLBAX (1.13). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FNCFX (13 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNCFX (0.42). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBAX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBAX (11.72) and FNCFX (11.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.36 vs. RLBAX (29.85).
| FNCFX | RLBAX | FNCFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.32 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.32 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.091 | 9.555 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 283B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 1.13 | 481% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 11.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 41.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.36 | 29.85 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.09 | 73.93 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers