Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBEX
FNCFX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBEX
FNCFX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FNCFX (79.1B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FNCFX (5.36) vs RLBEX (1.77). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FNCFX (13 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). RLBEX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FNCFX (0.42). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBEX (50.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBEX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.85 vs. FNCFX (12.83). RLBEX (34.08) and FNCFX (32.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNCFX | RLBEX | FNCFX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.60 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.60 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.455 | 8.255 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1B | 288B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.36 | 1.77 | 303% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 14.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.50 | 42.82 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.61 | 34.08 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.05 | 90.09 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers