Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBFX
Franklin Income R6
Price$2.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.88B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.45B
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FNCFX (75.9B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FNCFX (5.51) vs RLBFX (2.05). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FNCFX (12 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FNCFX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBFX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. FNCFX (7.67). FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.69 vs. RLBFX (39.86).
| FNCFX | RLBFX | FNCFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.373 | 10.302 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.9B | 256B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.51 | 2.05 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 8.79 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.24 | 38.41 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.69 | 39.86 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.65 | 79.00 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement