Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBFX
Franklin Income R6
Price$2.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.77B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.22B
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FNCFX (74.8B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FNCFX (5.65) vs RLBFX (2.10). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FNCFX (12 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FNCFX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBFX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). FNCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. RLBFX (7.40). FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.86 vs. RLBFX (42.34).
| FNCFX | RLBFX | FNCFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 8.457 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.8B | 252B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.65 | 2.10 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 7.40 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.80 | 36.90 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.86 | 42.34 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.61 | 66.96 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement