Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBFX
Franklin Income R6
Price$2.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.29B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.17
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FNCFX (76.3B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FNCFX (5.49) vs RLBFX (2.00). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FNCFX (12 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FNCFX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBFX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. FNCFX (7.59). FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.37 vs. RLBFX (44.28).
| FNCFX | RLBFX | FNCFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.763 | 15.154 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.3B | 266B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.49 | 2.00 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 10.26 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.01 | 53.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.37 | 44.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.66 | 80.75 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement