Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FNCFX (79.1B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FNCFX (5.36) vs RLBFX (2.02). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FNCFX (13 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FNCFX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBFX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. FNCFX (12.83). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. FNCFX (32.61).
| FNCFX | RLBFX | FNCFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.30 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.30 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.455 | 9.536 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1B | 288B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.36 | 2.02 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 17.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.50 | 45.61 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.61 | 37.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.05 | 93.65 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement