Ad is loading...
FNCMX vs GFACX
FNCMX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs GFACX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$217.42
Change+$23.58 (+12.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$58.83
Change+$5.60 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
FNCMX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. FNCMX (16.7B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FNCMX (0.67) vs GFACX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FNCMX (22 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FNCMX (0) vs GFACX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.78 vs. GFACX (-13.80). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.32 vs. GFACX (27.34).
| FNCMX | GFACX | FNCMX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.36 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.36 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.807 | -16.515 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 246B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.78 | -13.80 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.51 | -7.38 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.32 | 27.34 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.45 | 25.16 | 813% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...