Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs GFACX
FNCMX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs GFACX
FNCMX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FNCMX (27.2B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FNCMX (0.45) vs GFACX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FNCMX (23 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FNCMX (0) vs GFACX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.49 vs. GFACX (3.45). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.49 vs. GFACX (6.24).
| FNCMX | GFACX | FNCMX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.35 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.35 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.403 | 7.489 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.49 | 3.45 | 827% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.86 | 35.09 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.49 | 6.24 | 1,370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 438.24 | 85.53 | 512% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement