Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGAEX
FNCMX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGAEX
FNCMX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jul 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Hold and RGAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FNCMX (27.2B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGAEX: FNCMX (0.45) vs RGAEX (0.21). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). RGAEX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FNCMX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.49 vs. RGAEX (5.99). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.49 vs. RGAEX (15.59).
| FNCMX | RGAEX | FNCMX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.63 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.63 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.403 | 7.866 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.21 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.49 | 5.99 | 476% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.86 | 43.35 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.49 | 15.59 | 548% |
| Returns for 10 years | 438.24 | 109.56 | 400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement