Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGAEX
FNCMX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGAEX
FNCMX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FNCMX (28B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGAEX: FNCMX (0.45) vs RGAEX (0.21). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). RGAEX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FNCMX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. RGAEX (-0.00). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 79.89 vs. RGAEX (12.98).
| FNCMX | RGAEX | FNCMX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.63 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.63 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.647 | 9.051 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.21 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | -0.00 | -4,217,457% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.27 | 42.68 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.89 | 12.98 | 616% |
| Returns for 10 years | 407.71 | 105.92 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers