Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGAHX
FNCMX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGAHX
FNCMX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FNCMX (26.9B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FNCMX (0.47) vs RGAHX (0.41). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FNCMX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.20 vs. RGAHX (5.66). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.60 vs. RGAHX (17.79).
| FNCMX | RGAHX | FNCMX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.44 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.44 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.528 | 9.541 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 342B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.41 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.20 | 5.66 | 428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.31 | 47.83 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.60 | 17.79 | 475% |
| Returns for 10 years | 397.25 | 101.70 | 391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers