Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGAHX
FNCMX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGAHX
FNCMX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FNCMX (28B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FNCMX (0.45) vs RGAHX (0.40). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FNCMX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 79.89 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FNCMX | RGAHX | FNCMX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.44 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.44 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.647 | 9.200 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.40 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | 0.18 | 10,563% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.27 | 43.47 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.89 | 13.78 | 580% |
| Returns for 10 years | 407.71 | 106.68 | 382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement