Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$276.31
Change-$0.07 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FNCMX (20.9B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNCMX (0.54) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNCMX (22 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNCMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.49 vs. RGEBX (17.59). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 99.90 vs. RGEBX (38.71).
| FNCMX | RGEBX | FNCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.09 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.09 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.886 | 15.398 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.9B | 332B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.49 | 17.59 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.88 | 57.61 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.90 | 38.71 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 348.61 | 91.44 | 381% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement