Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$287.54
Change+$1.67 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. FNCMX (23.6B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNCMX (0.49) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNCMX (22 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNCMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. RGEBX (6.15). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 97.14 vs. RGEBX (30.81).
| FNCMX | RGEBX | FNCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.09 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.09 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.791 | 15.314 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 327B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.87 | 6.15 | 307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.18 | 60.18 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.14 | 30.81 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 336.28 | 81.54 | 412% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement