Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FNCMX (26.9B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNCMX (0.47) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNCMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.20 vs. RGEBX (4.65). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.60 vs. RGEBX (13.60).
| FNCMX | RGEBX | FNCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.528 | 9.105 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 342B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.20 | 4.65 | 520% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.31 | 43.99 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.60 | 13.60 | 622% |
| Returns for 10 years | 397.25 | 92.84 | 428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers