Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FNCMX (28B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNCMX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNCMX (23 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.29). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNCMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 79.89 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FNCMX | RGEBX | FNCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.647 | 8.727 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | -0.77 | -2,451% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.27 | 39.77 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.89 | 9.71 | 823% |
| Returns for 10 years | 407.71 | 97.58 | 418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement