Ad is loading...
FNCMX vs VIGRX
FNCMX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs VIGRX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$217.42
Change+$23.58 (+12.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$189.57
Change+$20.35 (+12.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
FNCMX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FNCMX (16.7B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than VIGRX: FNCMX (0.67) vs VIGRX (0.39). FNCMX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FNCMX (22 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). FNCMX (0.30) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: FNCMX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.20 vs. FNCMX (-5.78). VIGRX (96.01) and FNCMX (95.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNCMX | VIGRX | FNCMX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.17 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.17 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.807 | -19.911 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 261B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.39 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.78 | -4.20 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.51 | 17.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.32 | 96.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.45 | 201.77 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...