Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs VIGRX
FNCMX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs VIGRX
FNCMX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Hold and VIGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 394B vs. FNCMX (27.2B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than VIGRX: FNCMX (0.45) vs VIGRX (0.27). FNCMX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FNCMX (23 years) vs VIGRX (34 years). FNCMX (0.29) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FNCMX (4.00). FNCMX (0) and VIGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.49 vs. VIGRX (18.25). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.49 vs. VIGRX (78.06).
| FNCMX | VIGRX | FNCMX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.17 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.17 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.403 | 5.987 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 394B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.27 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.49 | 18.25 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.86 | 82.83 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.49 | 78.06 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 438.24 | 381.90 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers