Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCQX vs MSNCX
FNCQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FNCQX vs MSNCX
FNCQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCQX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCQX (567M) and MSNCX (557M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MSNCX (3.41) and FNCQX (3.33) have matching dividends . FNCQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FNCQX (9 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FNCQX (0.56). FNCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MSNCX (6.00). FNCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSNCX: FNCQX (0) vs MSNCX (1000). FNCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MSNCX (4.10). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FNCQX (-2.14).
| FNCQX | MSNCX | FNCQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.84 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.86 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.385 | -0.492 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 557M | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 3.41 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 4.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.43 | 10.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.14 | 0.15 | -1,421% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement