FNCSF
Price
$5.37
Change
+$0.05 (+0.94%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
319.89M
TRNLY
Price
$1.21
Change
+$0.06 (+5.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCSF vs TRNLY

Header iconFNCSF vs TRNLY Comparison
Open Charts FNCSF vs TRNLYBanner chart's image
North American Financial 15 Split
Price$5.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.94%)
Volume$700
Capitalization319.89M
The Trendlines Group
Price$1.21
Change+$0.06 (+5.22%)
Volume$500
Capitalization31.48M
FNCSF vs TRNLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCSF vs. TRNLY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCSF is a Hold and TRNLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCSF: $5.37 vs. TRNLY: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: FNCSF and TRNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCSF: 55% vs. TRNLY: 8%
Market capitalization -- FNCSF: $319.89M vs. TRNLY: $31.48M
FNCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $319.89M. TRNLY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $31.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TRNLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCSF is a better buy in the long-term than TRNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRNLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRNLY is a better buy in the short-term than FNCSF.

Price Growth

FNCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while TRNLY (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCSF($320M) has a higher market cap than TRNLY($31.5M). FNCSF YTD gains are higher at: 7.400 vs. TRNLY (-23.899). FNCSF has higher revenues than TRNLY: FNCSF (200M) vs TRNLY (643K).
FNCSFTRNLYFNCSF / TRNLY
Capitalization320M31.5M1,016%
EBITDAN/A-14.99M-
Gain YTD7.400-23.899-31%
P/E Ratio2.68N/A-
Revenue200M643K31,104%
Total CashN/A2.89M-
Total DebtN/A5.45M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCSF vs TRNLY: Fundamental Ratings
FNCSF
TRNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
1795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4683
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1691
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNLY (69). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (100). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNLY (95). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (83). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNLY (91). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCSFTRNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
37%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAGCX54.54N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth C
AREWX25.99N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate R
RPNIX11.27N/A
N/A
Riverpark/Next Century Gr Inst
SLGAX16.25N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap F (SIMT)
MSLLX20.14N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq L

FNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCSF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCSF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCSF
1D Price
Change %
FNCSF100%
+0.94%
WNDLF - FNCSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAM - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
AMG - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
SLFPY - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

TRNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRNLY has been loosely correlated with NINTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRNLY jumps, then NINTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNLY
1D Price
Change %
TRNLY100%
+5.22%
NINTF - TRNLY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNNA - TRNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
ELRNF - TRNLY
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.74%
FNNCF - TRNLY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
FNCSF - TRNLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More