Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCZX vs FQMDX
FNCZX vs FQMDX Comparison
Open Charts FNCZX vs FQMDX
FNCZX vs FQMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCZX vs. FQMDX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCZX is a Hold and FQMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCZX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. FQMDX (318M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FNCZX: FQMDX (3.31) vs FNCZX (3.14). FNCZX was incepted earlier than FQMDX: FNCZX (17 years) vs FQMDX (8 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FNCZX (0.60). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FNCZX (16.14). FNCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQMDX: FNCZX (0) vs FQMDX (1000). FNCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. FQMDX (6.81). FNCZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.53 vs. FQMDX (-0.31).
| FNCZX | FQMDX | FNCZX / FQMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.90 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.90 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.412 | 2.338 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 318M | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 3.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 6.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 9.93 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.53 | -0.31 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers