Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCZX vs FQMDX
FNCZX vs FQMDX Comparison
Open Charts FNCZX vs FQMDX
FNCZX vs FQMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCZX vs. FQMDX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCZX is a Hold and FQMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCZX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. FQMDX (306M). FQMDX (3.41) and FNCZX (3.26) have matching dividends . FNCZX was incepted earlier than FQMDX: FNCZX (17 years) vs FQMDX (8 years). FQMDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FNCZX (0.61). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FNCZX (16.14). FNCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQMDX: FNCZX (0) vs FQMDX (1000). FNCZX (4.69) and FQMDX (4.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FNCZX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. FQMDX (-2.75).
| FNCZX | FQMDX | FNCZX / FQMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.92 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.332 | -0.010 | 3,204% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 306M | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 3.41 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 4.51 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.15 | 8.71 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.32 | -2.75 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement