Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCZX vs FRORX
FNCZX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FNCZX vs FRORX
FNCZX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCZX vs. FRORX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCZX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. FNCZX (587M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FNCZX: FRORX (3.51) vs FNCZX (3.14). FNCZX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FNCZX (17 years) vs FRORX (39 years). FRORX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FNCZX (0.60). FRORX (16.43) and FNCZX (16.14) have comparable annual turnover. FNCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRORX: FNCZX (0) vs FRORX (1000). FNCZX (7.64) and FRORX (7.30) have marching annual gain over last year. FNCZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.53 vs. FRORX (-0.26).
| FNCZX | FRORX | FNCZX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.66 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.66 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.412 | 2.286 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 817M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 3.51 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 7.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 11.64 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.53 | -0.26 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.85 | 1.95 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers