Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDA vs QVMS
FNDA vs QVMS Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs QVMS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$30.18
Change-$0.15 (-0.49%)
Volume$984.06K
Net Assets8.64B
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
Price$27.62
Change+$0.58 (+2.14%)
Volume$670
Net Assets199.07M
FNDA vs QVMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. QVMS commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Hold and QVMS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDA has more net assets: 8.64B vs. QVMS (199M). QVMS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDA: QVMS (2.638) vs FNDA (2.063). FNDA was incepted earlier than QVMS: FNDA (12 years) vs QVMS (4 years). QVMS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FNDA (0.25). QVMS has a higher turnover FNDA (26.00) vs FNDA (26.00).
| FNDA | QVMS | FNDA / QVMS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.063 | 2.638 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 8.64B | 199M | 4,341% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.15 | 167% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 38.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 1.35 | 1.41 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||
QVMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||