Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDA vs QVMS
FNDA vs QVMS Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs QVMS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$30.02
Change+$0.20 (+0.67%)
Volume$808.24K
Net Assets8.63B
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
Price$26.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
Volume$306
Net Assets193.94M
FNDA vs QVMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. QVMS commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Hold and QVMS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDA has more net assets: 8.63B vs. QVMS (194M). FNDA has a higher annual dividend yield than QVMS: FNDA (1.522) vs QVMS (-1.505). FNDA was incepted earlier than QVMS: FNDA (12 years) vs QVMS (4 years). QVMS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FNDA (0.25). QVMS has a higher turnover FNDA (26.00) vs FNDA (26.00).
| FNDA | QVMS | FNDA / QVMS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.522 | -1.505 | -101% |
| Net Assets | 8.63B | 194M | 4,451% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.15 | 167% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 38.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.43 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UST | 42.55 | 0.22 | +0.51% |
| ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury | |||
| AIFD | 31.70 | 0.09 | +0.29% |
| TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | |||
| JPUS | 120.83 | 0.27 | +0.23% |
| JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF | |||
| GUSA | 54.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Eq ETF | |||
| HIPS | 12.43 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | |||
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
More | ||||
QVMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||