Advertisement
FNF vs MDPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNF is a Hold and MDPL is a Hold.
FNF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FNF | MDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 10 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while .
- FNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FNF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -3.60% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
FNF is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Insurance (-2.13% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
Advertisement
FNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNF has been closely correlated with FAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNF jumps, then FAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNF | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| FAF - FNF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| AIZ - FNF | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| ACT - FNF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NMIH - FNF | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ESNT - FNF | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
MDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDPL has been closely correlated with G. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDPL jumps, then G could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDPL | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| G - MDPL | 68% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| GPK - MDPL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| GPC - MDPL | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| FNF - MDPL | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| PHM - MDPL | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||