Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNFWX vs MCYSX
FNFWX vs MCYSX Comparison
Open Charts FNFWX vs MCYSX
FNFWX vs MCYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. MCYSX (136M). FNFWX pays higher dividends than MCYSX: FNFWX (1.15) vs MCYSX (1.00). FNFWX was incepted earlier than MCYSX: FNFWX (6 years) vs MCYSX (9 years). MCYSX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. FNFWX (46.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNFWX: MCYSX (0) vs FNFWX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.76 vs. FNFWX (30.40). MCYSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. FNFWX (21.10).
| FNFWX | MCYSX | FNFWX / MCYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.38 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.541 | 34.268 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 136M | 62,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.00 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.40 | 64.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.72 | 104.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.10 | 35.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JLGRX | 91.35 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R5 | |||
| KSOCX | 161.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Adv C | |||
| TRWRX | 28.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Transamerica International Equity R | |||
| GPGCX | 17.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Instl | |||
| BSMKX | 21.54 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx K | |||