Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNFWX vs RDWBX
FNFWX vs RDWBX Comparison
Open Charts FNFWX vs RDWBX
FNFWX vs RDWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNFWX vs. RDWBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNFWX is a Hold and RDWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. RDWBX (2.64B). FNFWX pays higher dividends than RDWBX: FNFWX (1.15) vs RDWBX (0.80). FNFWX was incepted earlier than RDWBX: FNFWX (6 years) vs RDWBX (13 years). RDWBX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). RDWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FNFWX (46.00). FNFWX (250) and RDWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.39 vs. FNFWX (21.14). RDWBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.11 vs. FNFWX (18.19).
| FNFWX | RDWBX | FNFWX / RDWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.445 | 17.892 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 2.64B | 3,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.80 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 29.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 66.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 26.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers