Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNFWX vs RDWBX
FNFWX vs RDWBX Comparison
Open Charts FNFWX vs RDWBX
FNFWX vs RDWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RDWBX (2.73B). RDWBX (1.20) and FNFWX (1.15) have matching dividends . FNFWX was incepted earlier than RDWBX: FNFWX (6 years) vs RDWBX (12 years). RDWBX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). RDWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FNFWX (46.00). FNFWX (250) and RDWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.92 vs. FNFWX (28.74). RDWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. FNFWX (21.64).
| FNFWX | RDWBX | FNFWX / RDWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.304 | 20.569 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 2.73B | 3,328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.74 | 40.92 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.93 | 66.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.64 | 28.71 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement