Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNFWX vs RDWFX
FNFWX vs RDWFX Comparison
Open Charts FNFWX vs RDWFX
FNFWX vs RDWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNFWX vs. RDWFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNFWX is a Hold and RDWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. RDWFX (2.64B). RDWFX pays higher dividends than FNFWX: RDWFX (1.64) vs FNFWX (1.15). FNFWX was incepted earlier than RDWFX: FNFWX (6 years) vs RDWFX (13 years). RDWFX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). RDWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FNFWX (46.00). FNFWX (250) and RDWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.24 vs. FNFWX (21.14). RDWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.08 vs. FNFWX (18.19).
| FNFWX | RDWFX | FNFWX / RDWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.83 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.83 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.445 | 20.135 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 2.64B | 3,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.64 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 32.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 74.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 33.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers