Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGAX vs REREX
FNGAX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts FNGAX vs REREX
FNGAX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGAX vs. REREX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGAX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FNGAX (627M). REREX pays higher dividends than FNGAX: REREX (2.54) vs FNGAX (0.32). FNGAX was incepted earlier than REREX: FNGAX (18 years) vs REREX (24 years). FNGAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). REREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FNGAX (25.70). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGAX: REREX (250) vs FNGAX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FNGAX (-1.11). REREX return over 5 years is better than : -6.15 vs. FNGAX (-20.86).
| FNGAX | REREX | FNGAX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.82 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.82 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.289 | 3.783 | 8% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 2.54 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 10.18 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | 22.66 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.86 | -6.15 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.47 | 55.98 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers