Ad is loading...
FNGO vs QLD
FNGO vs QLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGO vs. QLD commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGO is a Buy and QLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 6.82B vs. FNGO (396M). QLD (-13.984) and FNGO (-13.989) have matching annual dividend yield . FNGO was incepted earlier than QLD: FNGO (7 years) vs QLD (19 years). FNGO (0.95) and QLD (0.95) have comparable expense ratios .
| FNGO | QLD | FNGO / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | -13.989 | -13.984 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 396M | 6.82B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | N/A | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGO | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRV | 40.17 | 0.19 | +0.48% |
| NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund | |||
| IBMQ | 25.14 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| PSFD | 32.64 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF | |||
| BBMC | 91.35 | -0.05 | -0.05% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF | |||
| YXI | 11.56 | -0.04 | -0.33% |
| ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | |||
FNGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGO has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGO jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGO | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| AMZN - FNGO | 74% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| META - FNGO | 73% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| MSFT - FNGO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| GOOGL - FNGO | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| AAPL - FNGO | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SNPS - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| META - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
More | ||||