FNGO
Price
$151.84
Change
-$3.59 (-2.31%)
Updated
Sep 4, 03:48 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
748.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$90.68
Change
+$0.30 (+0.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
14.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNGO vs QLD

FNGO vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • FNGO is a 2x leveraged exchange-traded note (ETN) providing daily exposure to the concentrated 10-stock NYSE FANG+ Index, while QLD is a 2x leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) targeting twice the daily performance of the broader 100-stock Nasdaq-100 Index.
  • Both products carry an expense ratio of 0.95% and employ daily-reset leverage, resulting in similar cost structures but materially different concentration and volatility profiles.
  • FNGO offers thematic exposure focused on high-growth technology and consumer discretionary names, whereas QLD delivers diversified large-cap growth exposure across technology, consumer discretionary, communication services, and other sectors.
  • The ETN structure of FNGO introduces issuer credit risk from Bank of Montreal, a consideration absent in the ETF structure of QLD issued by ProShares.
  • Performance drivers for both center on mega-cap technology earnings cycles, but FNGO’s narrower holdings amplify sensitivity to individual stock moves compared with QLD’s wider basket.
  • Investors seeking concentrated FANG-themed leverage may prefer FNGO, while those targeting broader Nasdaq-100 participation typically evaluate QLD for its greater diversification within the same leveraged framework.

Introduction

Investors comparing leveraged technology exposure often evaluate MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) because both deliver 2x daily returns on major growth indices yet differ in concentration, structure, and risk characteristics. These funds do not compete directly for identical mandates; instead, they provide alternative routes to amplified technology-sector participation. FNGO emphasizes a narrow basket of leading technology and internet names, while QLD tracks the wider Nasdaq-100 Index. The comparison helps investors align leverage with desired levels of diversification and issuer considerations in the current environment of elevated technology valuations and shifting interest-rate expectations.

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) Overview

FNGO is a senior unsecured medium-term note issued by Bank of Montreal that seeks 2x the daily performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index, compounded daily, before fees. The underlying index is an equal-dollar-weighted benchmark comprising ten stocks selected for high trading volume and growth characteristics within technology and consumer discretionary sectors. The ETN holds no underlying securities and instead delivers returns through a derivatives-linked structure. Its expense ratio stands at 0.95%. Because it is an ETN rather than an ETF, investors assume credit risk of the issuing bank. The product resets leverage daily and is designed for short-term trading horizons rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD is an open-end ETF issued by ProShares that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 2x the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Nasdaq-100 Index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, spanning technology, consumer discretionary, communication services, healthcare, and other sectors. The ETF uses swaps and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.95%. As an ETF, QLD does not carry issuer credit risk in the same manner as an ETN. The fund resets leverage daily and distributes dividends quarterly. Its structure supports both short-term tactical use and ongoing exposure within a diversified leveraged framework.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the technology and growth-equity thematic environment, where capital flows remain sensitive to artificial-intelligence adoption, semiconductor demand, and regulatory developments affecting large technology platforms. Macroeconomic drivers include Federal Reserve interest-rate policy, corporate earnings growth from mega-cap technology companies, and global supply-chain dynamics. Sector risks encompass valuation compression if growth expectations moderate, potential antitrust actions, and geopolitical tensions affecting semiconductor and hardware supply chains. Recent market cycles have highlighted the resilience of technology earnings, yet investors continue to monitor concentration risk and the pace of capital expenditure by leading technology firms.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both products have exhibited amplified moves relative to their unleveraged benchmarks, with volatility magnified by the daily 2x reset mechanism. FNGO’s concentrated holdings produce larger relative swings when individual FANG+ constituents report earnings or experience sentiment shifts. QLD’s broader Nasdaq-100 exposure tends to moderate single-stock impact, resulting in comparatively lower idiosyncratic volatility within the leveraged category. Relative positioning depends on investor preference for thematic concentration versus diversified large-cap growth participation. Sector rotation favoring broader technology leadership has periodically benefited QLD, while periods of concentrated outperformance among core FANG names have favored FNGO. Both remain sensitive to interest-rate expectations and overall equity-market risk appetite.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors evaluating leveraged ETFs such as FNGO and QLD may use the platform to compare technical signals and relative strength metrics across similar products.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to QLD. The ETF structure eliminates issuer credit risk, the broader Nasdaq-100 universe provides greater diversification, and the liquidity profile supports tighter spreads. FNGO’s concentrated exposure and ETN structure introduce additional considerations that may outweigh its thematic focus for many investors. This assessment reflects relative positioning rather than a guarantee of future results.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FNGO vs. QLD commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGO is a StrongBuy and QLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 14.1B vs. FNGO (749M). FNGO has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: FNGO (33.382) vs QLD (28.902). FNGO was incepted earlier than QLD: FNGO (8 years) vs QLD (20 years). FNGO (0.95) and QLD (0.95) have comparable expense ratios .
FNGOQLDFNGO / QLD
Gain YTD33.38228.902116%
Net Assets749M14.1B5%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.95100%
TurnoverN/A16.00-
Yield0.000.13-
Fund Existence8 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNGOQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QFLR35.380.05
+0.14%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
EAOA45.88N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
OPPG38.18N/A
N/A
WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund
ONOF41.12-0.14
-0.34%
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
SKYY161.56-2.36
-1.44%
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF