Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNIAX vs RGACX
FNIAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FNIAX vs RGACX
FNIAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNIAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNIAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FNIAX (28.2B). FNIAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FNIAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FNIAX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FNIAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). FNIAX (32.00) and RGACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FNIAX (0) vs RGACX (250). FNIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RGACX (3.68). FNIAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FNIAX | RGACX | FNIAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.93 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.93 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.731 | 6.959 | 169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 3.68 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.12 | 37.13 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 13.46 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.96 | 97.58 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers