Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNIAX vs RGAFX
FNIAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FNIAX vs RGAFX
FNIAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNIAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNIAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FNIAX (28.2B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FNIAX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FNIAX (0.00). FNIAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FNIAX (23 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FNIAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FNIAX (32.00) and RGAFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FNIAX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FNIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RGAFX (4.67). FNIAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| FNIAX | RGAFX | FNIAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.34 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.34 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.731 | 7.299 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 4.67 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.12 | 40.73 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 17.46 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.96 | 105.95 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement