Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNIAX vs RGAGX
FNIAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FNIAX vs RGAGX
FNIAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNIAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNIAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FNIAX (27.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FNIAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FNIAX (0.00). FNIAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FNIAX (23 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FNIAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FNIAX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FNIAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FNIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.08 vs. RGAGX (0.49). FNIAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.86 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FNIAX | RGAGX | FNIAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.29 | 369% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.29 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 9.321 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 0.49 | 835% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.43 | 44.65 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.86 | 15.00 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.58 | 110.30 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement