Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNICX vs RGAFX
FNICX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FNICX vs RGAFX
FNICX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNICX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNICX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FNICX (27.4B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FNICX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FNICX (0.00). FNICX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FNICX (23 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FNICX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FNICX (32.00) and RGAFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNICX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FNICX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. FNICX (-0.70). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. FNICX (-2.92).
| FNICX | RGAFX | FNICX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.34 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.34 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.307 | 9.276 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 0.42 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.83 | 44.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.92 | 14.74 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.90 | 109.80 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement