Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKCX is a StrongBuy and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.7B vs. FNKCX (35M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FNKCX: MVCAX (1.09) vs FNKCX (0.51). FNKCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FNKCX (16 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). FNKCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (0.98). FNKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.26 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNKCX: MVCAX (1000) vs FNKCX (1500). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. FNKCX (4.78). FNKCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.97 vs. MVCAX (20.74).
| FNKCX | MVCAX | FNKCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.97 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.98 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.715 | 17.692 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35M | 17.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 13.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 29.68 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.97 | 20.74 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.19 | 86.14 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement