Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNKLX vs RMEBX
FNKLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNKLX vs RMEBX
FNKLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKLX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FNKLX (17.7B). FNKLX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FNKLX (1.73) vs RMEBX (0.99). FNKLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FNKLX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FNKLX (0.00). FNKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FNKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FNKLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FNKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.93 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. FNKLX (30.04).
| FNKLX | RMEBX | FNKLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.960 | 10.367 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 118B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.99 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.93 | 9.03 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 38.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.04 | 35.75 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.45 | 90.55 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement