FNLC
Price
$33.34
Change
-$0.43 (-1.27%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
386.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSBW
Price
$43.29
Change
-$0.54 (-1.23%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
349.63M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLC vs FSBW

FNLC vs FSBW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLC vs. FSBW commentary
Oct 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLC is a StrongBuy and FSBW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLC vs FSBW: Fundamental Ratings
FNLC
FSBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3440
SMR RATING
1..100
4136
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLC's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (24). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (40). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's SMR Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (41). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (44). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (36). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLCFSBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2026
Stock price -- (FNLC: $33.34 vs. FSBW: $43.29)
Brand notoriety: FNLC and FSBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLC: 108% vs. FSBW: 158%
Market capitalization -- FNLC: $386.98M vs. FSBW: $349.63M
FNLC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $386.98M. FSBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $349.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FSBW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNLC and FSBW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the short-term than FNLC.

Price Growth

FNLC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FNLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBVIU10.30N/A
N/A
M3 Brigade Acquisition VI Corp
TLNC10.24-0.02
-0.19%
Talon Capital Corp
BYSI0.77N/A
-0.43%
BeyondSpring
PNR52.99-0.48
-0.90%
Pentair plc
HOPE13.29-0.15
-1.12%
Hope Bancorp

FNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLC
1D Price
Change %
FNLC100%
-1.27%
THFF - FNLC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
SRCE - FNLC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
GABC - FNLC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
BY - FNLC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
EFSC - FNLC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been loosely correlated with HBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then HBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
-1.23%
HBT - FSBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
PCB - FSBW
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
CCBG - FSBW
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
FNLC - FSBW
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
OBT - FSBW
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
More