FNNTF
Price
$32.80
Change
+$1.55 (+4.96%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.48B
HYHDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
12.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNTF vs HYHDF

Header iconFNNTF vs HYHDF Comparison
Open Charts FNNTF vs HYHDFBanner chart's image
FLATEXDEGIRO AG
Price$32.80
Change+$1.55 (+4.96%)
Volume$262
Capitalization3.48B
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization12.81M
FNNTF vs HYHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNTF vs. HYHDF commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNTF is a Hold and HYHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNTF: $32.80 vs. HYHDF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: FNNTF and HYHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNTF: 61% vs. HYHDF: 23%
Market capitalization -- FNNTF: $3.48B vs. HYHDF: $12.81M
FNNTF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.48B. HYHDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYHDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYHDF is a better buy in the long-term than FNNTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYHDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNTF is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

FNNTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.96% price change this week, while HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNNTF($3.49B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($12.8M). FNNTF has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: FNNTF (23.04) vs HYHDF (2.53). FNNTF YTD gains are higher at: 116.502 vs. HYHDF (16.587). FNNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227M vs. HYHDF (5.16M). FNNTF has more cash in the bank: 4.16B vs. HYHDF (19.3M). HYHDF has less debt than FNNTF: HYHDF (2.89M) vs FNNTF (145M). FNNTF has higher revenues than HYHDF: FNNTF (499M) vs HYHDF (8.4M).
FNNTFHYHDFFNNTF / HYHDF
Capitalization3.49B12.8M27,227%
EBITDA227M5.16M4,396%
Gain YTD116.50216.587702%
P/E Ratio23.042.53911%
Revenue499M8.4M5,938%
Total Cash4.16B19.3M21,549%
Total Debt145M2.89M5,017%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNTF vs HYHDF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNTF
HYHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
5224
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HYHDF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNTF (95). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNTF (52). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (38). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNTF (12). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNTFHYHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPTH6.690.60
+9.85%
LightPath Technologies
RDNT75.200.84
+1.12%
RadNet
HOOD118.641.26
+1.07%
Robinhood Markets
LGL6.300.05
+0.80%
LGL Group (The)
FIGS7.29-0.04
-0.55%
FIGS

FNNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNTF and DPXCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNTF and DPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNTF
1D Price
Change %
FNNTF100%
N/A
DPXCF - FNNTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - FNNTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
ABIT - FNNTF
10%
Poorly correlated
-11.62%
HYHDF - FNNTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCF - FNNTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
More

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
N/A
PIHG - HYHDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPXGY - HYHDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
EUXTF - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
LNSTY - HYHDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
HKXCY - HYHDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More