Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$72.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.86M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MWOFX (896M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.73) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. MWOFX (-2.12). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. MWOFX (15.00).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.828 | 3.815 | 441% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 896M | 17,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.01 | 12,850% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | -2.12 | -571% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.28 | 23.89 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 15.00 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.94 | - |