Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$75.15
Change+$0.28 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.87B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$66.47
Change+$0.21 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.36M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. MWOFX (939M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.75) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. MWOFX (0.43). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.24 vs. MWOFX (23.24).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.014 | 7.906 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 939M | 17,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.01 | 12,959% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 0.43 | 3,637% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.87 | 37.42 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.24 | 23.24 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement