Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$59.20
Change-$2.45 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$57.95
Change-$2.02 (-3.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets919.72M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. MWOFX (920M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.90) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MWOFX (31 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. MWOFX (-2.62). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.87 vs. MWOFX (57.38).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.725 | -2.646 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 920M | 15,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.01 | 14,240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | -2.62 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.22 | 0.92 | 351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.87 | 57.38 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...