Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.59
Change-$0.81 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$62.14
Change-$1.12 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.11M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MWOFX (914M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. MWOFX (0.36). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. MWOFX (35.87).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.841 | 2.695 | 328% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 914M | 16,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.01 | 13,603% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 0.36 | 2,613% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 28.19 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.86 | 35.87 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement