Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$61.68
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.54B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$58.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.71M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MWOFX (885M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.90) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MWOFX (31 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. MWOFX (-2.47). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.60 vs. MWOFX (36.63).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.676 | -4.886 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 885M | 15,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.01 | 14,240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -2.47 | -244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 8.40 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.60 | 36.63 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...