Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs RGPAX
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.28
Change-$0.42 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets504.81M
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGPAX (505M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: FNPFX (0.75) vs RGPAX (0.35). FNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: FNPFX (9 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). RGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: RGPAX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. FNPFX (14.29). RGPAX (39.40) and FNPFX (38.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | RGPAX | FNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.00 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 8.20 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.614 | 15.611 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 505M | 32,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.35 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.29 | 15.24 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 58.37 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.01 | 39.40 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement