Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs RGPAX
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$73.54
Change-$0.21 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.55M
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. RGPAX (502M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: FNPFX (0.77) vs RGPAX (0.36). FNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: FNPFX (9 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). RGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: RGPAX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). RGPAX (15.52) and FNPFX (15.19) have marching annual gain over last year. RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. FNPFX (40.78).
| FNPFX | RGPAX | FNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.00 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 8.20 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.422 | 14.451 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 502M | 32,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.36 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.19 | 15.52 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.69 | 49.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.78 | 44.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement