Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs ZGFRX
FNPFX vs ZGFRX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs ZGFRX
FNPFX vs ZGFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFRX (345M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFRX: FNPFX (1.26) vs ZGFRX (0.70). FNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFRX: FNPFX (10 years) vs ZGFRX (2 years). ZGFRX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.40). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFRX (14.00). ZGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: ZGFRX (0) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. ZGFRX (3.92).
| FNPFX | ZGFRX | FNPFX / ZGFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.83 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.03 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.383 | 3.884 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 345M | 49,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.70 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.22 | 3.92 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.82 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement