Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs PDLFX
FNSFX vs PDLFX Comparison
Open Charts FNSFX vs PDLFX
FNSFX vs PDLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. PDLFX commentary
Jun 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and PDLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 9.55B vs. PDLFX (10.6M). PDLFX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: PDLFX (1.76) vs FNSFX (1.21). FNSFX was incepted earlier than PDLFX: FNSFX (9 years) vs PDLFX (9 years). PDLFX (7.73) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). PDLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FNSFX (18.00). FNSFX (0) and PDLFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.98 vs. PDLFX (21.08). FNSFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. PDLFX (30.59).
| FNSFX | PDLFX | FNSFX / PDLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.60 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 7.73 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.093 | 9.272 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.55B | 10.6M | 90,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.76 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.98 | 21.08 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.97 | 49.06 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | 30.59 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers