Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs PDLGX
FNSFX vs PDLGX Comparison
Open Charts FNSFX vs PDLGX
FNSFX vs PDLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. PDLGX commentary
Jun 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and PDLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 9.55B vs. PDLGX (10.6M). PDLGX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: PDLGX (1.86) vs FNSFX (1.21). FNSFX was incepted earlier than PDLGX: FNSFX (9 years) vs PDLGX (9 years). PDLGX (10.16) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). PDLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FNSFX (18.00). FNSFX (0) and PDLGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.98 vs. PDLGX (21.21). FNSFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. PDLGX (31.13).
| FNSFX | PDLGX | FNSFX / PDLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.50 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 10.16 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.093 | 9.266 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.55B | 10.6M | 90,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.86 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.98 | 21.21 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.97 | 49.47 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | 31.13 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers