Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSTX vs RGFTX
FNSTX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FNSTX vs RGFTX
FNSTX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSTX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSTX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. FNSTX (145M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FNSTX: RGFTX (2.68) vs FNSTX (0.87). FNSTX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FNSTX (7 years) vs RGFTX (10 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNSTX (0.94). FNSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). FNSTX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. RGFTX (2.68). FNSTX return over 5 years is better than : 49.70 vs. RGFTX (17.49).
| FNSTX | RGFTX | FNSTX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.22 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.714 | 6.771 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 592M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 2.68 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 2.68 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.80 | 38.58 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.70 | 17.49 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement