Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSTX vs RGFTX
FNSTX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FNSTX vs RGFTX
FNSTX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSTX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSTX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 602M vs. FNSTX (155M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FNSTX: RGFTX (2.64) vs FNSTX (0.85). FNSTX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FNSTX (7 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNSTX (0.94). FNSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). FNSTX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RGFTX (4.44). FNSTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.35 vs. RGFTX (19.85).
| FNSTX | RGFTX | FNSTX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.22 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.449 | 8.919 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 602M | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.64 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 4.44 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.63 | 42.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.35 | 19.85 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement