Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs FOFQX
FNTAX vs FOFQX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs FOFQX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.38M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.03
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets793.97M
FNTAX vs FOFQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. FOFQX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and FOFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 794M vs. FNTAX (70.4M). FOFQX (3.26) and FNTAX (3.17) have matching dividends . FNTAX was incepted earlier than FOFQX: FNTAX (24 years) vs FOFQX (7 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FOFQX (0.81). FNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FOFQX (11.31). FNTAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNTAX: FOFQX (1000) vs FNTAX (2500). FNTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.36 vs. FOFQX (-1.47). FNTAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.58 vs. FOFQX (-6.88).
| FNTAX | FOFQX | FNTAX / FOFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.81 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.020 | -2.236 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 794M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.36 | -1.47 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.13 | 1.65 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.58 | -6.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.09 | N/A | - |