Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs FOFQX
FNTAX vs FOFQX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs FOFQX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.25M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets797.16M
FNTAX vs FOFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. FOFQX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and FOFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 797M vs. FNTAX (69.2M). FOFQX (3.24) and FNTAX (3.16) have matching dividends . FNTAX was incepted earlier than FOFQX: FNTAX (24 years) vs FOFQX (7 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FOFQX (0.82). FNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FOFQX (11.31). FNTAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNTAX: FOFQX (1000) vs FNTAX (2500). FOFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.55 vs. FNTAX (-1.21). FNTAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.08 vs. FOFQX (-6.24).
| FNTAX | FOFQX | FNTAX / FOFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.82 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.82 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.393 | -2.306 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.2M | 797M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -0.55 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.08 | 3.22 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | -6.24 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement